Friday, January 3, 2013 —
RALEIGH —Whenever folks begin preaching about political polarization in America, they have a tendency to focus on the symptoms.
After all, the symptoms are everywhere.
It is politicians calling each other liars or shouting each other down. It is cable TV talking heads becoming the proxies for political parties. It is former friends refusing to speak to one another.
Anyone can easily see, in conversation with friends or family or through exchanges on social media sites, that the political divide has widened, our dialogue about politics has become more coarse.
My wife recently relayed a story in which she left a dinner table after hearing those around her begin tossing around the word “communist” as if Stalin were reborn and headed down Pennsylvania Avenue.
I’m not sure whether any of those involved in the conversation had yet burned down their houses in protest of a new collective.
Of course, we have a two-party system in the United States and political division and divisiveness are nothing new.
But so often, the implication of today’s political dialogue is that those on one side or the other are either not “real Americans” or that their political views are just a well-disguised means to further their own greed.
Against this backdrop, N.C. State University’s Emerging Issues Institute recently had a series of discussions about political polarization dubbed the “Redesigning Democracy Summit.”
The organizers correctly identify political polarization as a threat to the required political consensus and action needed to address the country’s problems.
As David Brooks of The New York Times has written, today’s politics seems predicated on the unrealistic belief that one political party or the other is going to obliterate the opposing political party and completely have its way.
That unrealistic notion becomes a hurdle to the compromises that have always been necessary to fashion political solutions.
But the what and how don’t explain the why.
The two 800-pound gorillas that are so often ignored when discussing the polarized political landscape are money and lines.
In electoral politics, vast sums of the money that fuel seven- and eight-figure political campaigns come from the far right and far left, not the middle.
Is it any surprise that the politicians answer to those who provide the campaign dollars? Is it any surprise that their words become those of the left and right, and that the political middle becomes muted?
The political interests of the middle, particularly the middle-class wage earner, is no better represented at the statehouse. Who is paying their lobbyist? When do they get up and speak at the committee podium?
The lines that dictate political polarization appear on maps of legislative and congressional districts. They are drawn not to keep residents of one region or another together but to put one political party or the other in power.
The result is safe districts, decided in political primaries not general elections, where more partisan voters elect more partisan candidates.
Our politically polarized world won’t change until the money and the lines begin changing.
Opinion & Letters to the Editor
Money and lines behind political polarization
- Opinion & Letters to the Editor
-
-
Ronald McDonald House of benefit to us all
On Tuesday, Stanly County Managers Association members heard a presentation concerning the Ronald McDonald House in Charlotte.
-
Celebrating small businesses and continuing new ways of communicating
Some stories are worth mentioning again.
-
Editorial: Seizure of AP phone records insult to independent press
This amounts to spying on an American news organization -- common practice in dictatorships but scary conduct in a democratic system that prizes the public value of an independent watchdog press.
-
Google shuts down SMS search, angers people who had forgotten it existed
Instead of texting back search results, Google responds with a short message noting that the service "has been shutdown" (sic) and that you can continue to search the Web by visiting google.com (duh).
-
Walking by Faith
Last week I wrote about waiting on the Lord. I really needed to hear from the Lord, but all I was receiving was “wait.” I really don’t like to wait, but it is important to give God the opportunity to work things out before we proceed. After we wait on God, the next thing we are going to be asked to do is to walk by faith. That means that God is only going to reveal one step at a time, which is almost as much fun as “wait.”
-
Jettie Parker
Jettie Frick Parker, 89, of Albemarle died at 2 a.m. Friday, May 3, 2013, in Trinity Place, Albemarle.
-
Always Learning
I am teaching a class this semester that I haven’t taught in over a dozen years. Although I have taught it before, it still has a feeling of being new. The curriculum has been updated, and I must spend a good bit of time reviewing and preparing for the lesson each day. It doesn’t surprise me that often that I will come across something I didn’t know. The other day I made a big fuss about learning something new. The kids had a good time with that; their teacher learned something new.
-
West of Memphis: My Favorite Documentary Gets a New Partner
I saw “Paradise Lost: The Child Murders of Robin Hood Hills” when it played in theaters in 1996. At some point during the viewing, it became my favorite documentary. A position it has held for nearly 20 years. I own a copy of it, along with the two sequels “(Paradise Lost 2: Revelations” and “Paradise Lost 3: Purgatory).” Many know part of the story told in the films; it is a story that everyone should witness.
-
Childhood bullying linked to adult psychological disorders
A significant study from Duke provides the best evidence we’ve had thus far that bullying in childhood is linked to a higher risk of psychological disorders in adulthood. The results came as a surprise to the research team.
-
Saturday night with ‘The Rocketman’ Elton John
The Grateful Dead had its Deadheads.
Jimmy Buffett has his Parrotheads.
I guess Elton John has his … Eltonites? - More Opinion & Letters to the Editor Headlines
-


